SAFA Responds to Minister Gayton McKenzie’s Demand for VAR Funds

The ongoing dispute over the implementation of Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology in South African football has taken a new turn, with the South African Football Association (SAFA) issuing a formal statement after Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie demanded the return of funds allocated to the project.

Speaking at the South African Sports Awards in Sun City on Sunday night, McKenzie expressed his frustration: “I wrote a letter to SAFA and said they must return the money. They asked for 21 days’ grace. I am just as angry, because what more can I do? I asked them to bring back the money of the state because I am responsible for it.”

The Minister’s remarks came after months of delays in the rollout of VAR, despite the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture (DSAC) transferring R30 million to SAFA in April 2026 to support the project. McKenzie’s demand highlighted growing concerns about accountability and transparency in the use of public funds.

In its statement, SAFA confirmed that the R20 million (NOT R30 million) received from DSAC remains untouched. “The full amount remains secure in a separate account, together with the interest accrued, pending the completion of the outstanding governance, budget verification and procurement processes,” the Association said.

SAFA explained that prior to receiving the funding, it had already conducted a technical evaluation of VAR technology and identified three preferred providers. However, no contractual agreements were signed, as the National Executive Committee (NEC) required further financial and governance reviews before proceeding.

At its meeting on 9–10 May 2026, the NEC approved the VAR project in principle but directed that the Finance Committee and a dedicated task team review the budget and procurement considerations. This step, SAFA noted, was essential to ensure compliance with governance policies.

The Association also revealed that it had engaged with the Premier Soccer League (PSL) through the Joint Liaison Committee (JLC). Presentations were made to both the JLC and the PSL Executive Committee as part of the consultation process, reflecting SAFA’s effort to involve key stakeholders in the decision-making.

Acknowledging delays, SAFA stated: “The governance, financial verification and due diligence processes have taken longer than initially anticipated. However, it is important to emphasise that the funds have not been spent.”

Following discussions with DSAC on 18 August, SAFA confirmed that the Department granted a final 21-day extension to conclude the outstanding processes and submit a comprehensive report. This report will include recommendations from the review and confirmation of the funds held.

SAFA’s statement sought to reassure the football community that the project remains on track, albeit delayed. “The Association remains committed to ensuring that VAR is implemented in a manner that is transparent, financially responsible, compliant with governance and procurement requirements and sustainable,” it said.

While McKenzie’s demand underscores his impatience, SAFA’s response highlights the complexities of governance and procurement in large-scale projects. The tension between urgency and accountability has now placed the spotlight firmly on SAFA’s ability to deliver.

As the 21-day deadline approaches, the future of VAR in South Africa hangs in the balance. McKenzie’s insistence on accountability and SAFA’s pledge of transparency set the stage for a decisive moment in the country’s football governance.