Grassroots vs Technology: Kermit Erasmus Calls for Investment in Youth Facilities Over VAR
Former Orlando Pirates and Mamelodi Sundowns forward Kermit Erasmus has sparked debate in South African football after questioning the country’s heavy focus on Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology.
In a heartfelt post on X (Twitter), Erasmus wrote: “Leave VAR. Instead we could be building facilities for the next generation with that money, we focusing on the wrong things. Wishing everyone a great week ahead. Stay blessed.” His words resonated with many who believe grassroots development should take priority over expensive technology.
Erasmus’s comments come at a time when VAR has become a contentious issue in South Africa. While many leagues around the world have adopted the system, its rollout locally has been plagued by delays, financial disputes, and administrative hurdles.
Minister of Sports, Arts, and Culture, Gayton McKenzie, has been vocal about his frustration with the South African Football Association (SAFA). He insists that despite R13 million being allocated for VAR, little progress has been made. “We were supposed to have VAR,” McKenzie lamented, adding that he has formally requested SAFA to return the funds.
McKenzie explained that FIFA’s rules require VAR implementation to go through SAFA, not directly through his ministry. “FIFA’s rules state clearly that it has to happen through SAFA. I took journalists and administrators to Spain and the UK to compare which one is the best for us. I can’t do more as a minister. What else can I do?” he told the media after the South African Sports Awards in Sun City.
The minister further revealed that he wrote to SAFA demanding the money be returned. SAFA, however, requested a 21-day grace period. “I am just as angry, because what more can I do? I asked them to bring back the money of the state because I am responsible for it,” McKenzie said.
This tug-of-war between government and football administrators has left fans, coaches, and players frustrated. Many argue that the lack of VAR undermines fairness in matches, while others, like Erasmus, believe the money could be better spent elsewhere.
Grassroots football in South Africa has long struggled with inadequate facilities, poor infrastructure, and limited investment. Erasmus’s call highlights the need to prioritise the next generation of players, ensuring they have access to proper training grounds and resources.
McKenzie’s insistence on accountability, however, underscores the seriousness of the issue. The R13 million was earmarked specifically for VAR, and the minister is determined to ensure that taxpayer money is not wasted.
The debate now centers on whether VAR is truly essential for South African football at this stage. While it promises fairness and accuracy in officiating, critics argue that the country’s football ecosystem has more pressing needs.
Erasmus’s voice adds weight to this argument. As a player who has experienced both local and international football, his perspective reflects the concerns of many professionals who see grassroots development as the foundation of long-term success.
Meanwhile, McKenzie’s ultimatum places SAFA under immense pressure. With the 21-day deadline looming, the association must decide whether to return the funds or accelerate efforts to implement VAR.
The controversy also raises broader questions about governance in South African sport. Mismanagement and delays have often hindered progress, leaving athletes and fans disillusioned.
For Erasmus, the solution is clear: invest in the future. His message is not just about facilities, but about creating opportunities for young players to thrive.
As the debate intensifies, one thing is certain—South African football stands at a crossroads. Whether the focus shifts toward VAR or grassroots development, the decisions made in the coming weeks will shape the game’s future for years to come.